I am starting to get irked at how many pages there are that now only load properly on IE. I like Netscape. I've used Netscape ever since Mosaic got taken off the UW Madison computer lab computers back in, say, 1995. I've had to use Explorer a little bit, and don't find it superior in any way to Netscape. I think the only reason so many people are using IE is because it came as the default on their computers. As far asI can see, even alternate browsers like iCab and Opera aren't getting all the pages properly. I don't want to use IE. Bill Gates can bite me. I think something is rotten when the Internet can only be viewed through a certain brand name. It would be as if you could only get all of the TV channels if you had a Sony, and Philips just wouldn't do. How many people would be happy if they could get radio reception if they listened on an RCA, but intermittent static on an Emerson?
I am starting to
I am starting to get irked at how many pages there are that now only load properly on IE. I like Netscape. I've used Netscape ever since Mosaic got taken off the UW Madison computer lab computers back in, say, 1995. I've had to use Explorer a little bit, and don't find it superior in any way to Netscape. I think the only reason so many people are using IE is because it came as the default on their computers. As far asI can see, even alternate browsers like iCab and Opera aren't getting all the pages properly. I don't want to use IE. Bill Gates can bite me. I think something is rotten when the Internet can only be viewed through a certain brand name. It would be as if you could only get all of the TV channels if you had a Sony, and Philips just wouldn't do. How many people would be happy if they could get radio reception if they listened on an RCA, but intermittent static on an Emerson?